Sunday, September 9, 2012

A HERO IN CALIFORNIA LEADS THE WAY


This is an interesting idea.  What many people don't realize is Chinese investors have been buying up these properties in the Inland Empire and high desert communities of Southern California.  It appears China is unloading its inventory of dollar cash into hard real estate as fast as they can. While people can't get their homes refinanced, speculators are grabbing them up for pennies on the dollar when they are foreclosed.  Its a bit of a ghost town in these communities, lots of failed businesses and empty shopping malls. -AK



Reblogged from: http://goo.gl/f1Pq8

RAT-F---ING THE BANKERS: A HERO IN CALIFORNIA LEADS THE WAY
09.07.2012, 09:49 am

Over the weekend, there was a fascinating article about the foreclosure crisis in Southern California that appeared at the Huffington Post with the title “San Bernardino Eminent Domain Fight Closely Watched By Other Struggling Communities.” That title might not have grabbed you, but what’s in the article, penned by Ben Hallman, is extraordinary and needs to gain more traction.

If you read what’s written there and disregard all of the “opinion” (what Rahm Emanuel and the banking PR flacks have to say) and just concentrate on the plan of action that’s being offered to deal with the mortgage crisis, it’s a winner.

It’s being proposed that “eminent domain,” the power local government have to seize property for the common good, be employed to help stressed communities in San Bernardino County. The idea for this originates with Steven Gluckstern, the executive director of Mortgage Resolution Partners: Local authorities could seize home loans—not properties—and “condemn” the ones that were underwater, though not in arrears, and held by private trusts. The local government would then forgive the debt in excess of current market value of the home. Homeowners could then refinance at the new, lower value, freeing up hundred of dollars per month, and boosting the local economy and jobs growth. The pension and institutional investment funds that actually own these loans would get paid fair market value. For investors in Inland Empire property, this will mean taking a significant haircut.

It’s estimated that there are around 150,000 homeowners in the county who owe more on their homes than they are worth, yet only a small percentage of them would actually qualify for a loan modification because their credit is bad.

One estimate sees as many as 42,000 homeowners in San Bernardino County benefiting from the plan. It would have a significant impact on the lives of county residents.


It’s also a beautiful solution that f---s over the capitalist greed-heads who deserve it the most. They made investments in bad securities. That’s capitalism, baby! S--- happens!

It’s thrilling to think we could be on the verge of seeing something like this occur:
"This old railroad town in the heart of the Southern California foreclosure belt doesn’t attract many visitors these days, especially not in the blazing summer heat. Yet on a recent Thursday morning, a handful of well-heeled business travelers from the East Coast hurried along a sidewalk to address a government official they have come to know well.
Gregory Devereaux is the chief executive of San Bernardino County and its 2 million residents. At his urging, local authorities are considering a proposal that would allow local governments to exercise their power to seize private property without landowners’ consent in a dramatic—some say radical—new way.
Governments usually use this power, known as eminent domain, to acquire private land for public purposes, such as roads or utility lines. But this plan, proposed by a San Francisco-based venture fund Mortgage Resolution Partners, calls for government authorities to seize the mortgages of underwater borrowers, paying the investors that own them a fraction of what they are owed, using money borrowed from the fund. Homeowners could then refinance with a federal loan at a much lower rate, based on what their home is actually worth instead of what they owe.
Supporters say the plan would send a supercharged bolt of energy into the housing market, spurring economic development and preventing even more of the foreclosures that have wrecked many communities.
 “It is a disaster of epic proportions,” said John Vlahoplus, chief strategy officer at Mortgage Resolution Partners, of the dramatic decline in home prices that in many areas has left homes worth less than half what the borrowers paid. “The crash has devastated the family wealth of these communities.”
Gregory Devereaux… you are my new hero.

You’ve met the good guys, now meet the bad guys (so to speak):

The group from the East Coast, representatives of the mortgage finance industry, don’t like this idea much at all. They have worn a path to Devereaux’s office in recent months to tell him, and anyone else who would listen, that the proposal amounts to nothing less than a threat to the entire mortgage finance system, and an assault on free enterprise and the U.S. Constitution.
They’re sort of right about that, but have you been in San Bernadino County lately? It’s very very easy to see why a plan like this would be popular in the Inland Empire: It’s getting to be just like Mad Max there. The local economies will never recover with so many residents underwater on their mortgages. If you owe $400,000 on a house that’s worth $150,000, tops, not that you could sell it anyway, just what the fuck are you going to do next? What if you lose your income? Then what’s your move?

You don’t have one. The bulldozer-like plan that Mr. Devereaux is proposing has the potential to change the lives of tens of thousands of desperate families in his county. He’s worried about them, not about some bankers, mortgage brokers and fat cats taking the hit. (Did I mention yet that Gregory Devereaux is my new hero?)

Absent something like this, how would the Inland Empire EVER be expected to recover? It probably won’t be during many of the current generation’s lifetimes, we’re talking decades to recover. Seriously, it’s fucking GRIM there. Really, really super grim. (Comparing parts of San Bernadino to Mad Max is only a slight exaggeration, trust me)

[“Blah, blah. blah” said mortgage industry spokespeople. “Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah” said someone else. Back to what matters…]

Proponents, meanwhile, argue that bold measures are worth considering in the face of a festering foreclosure crisis. Recent modest increases in home prices have done little to help the estimated 16 million underwater homeowners nationwide, who, according to the real estate valuation website Zillow, collectively owe $1.2 trillion more than their homes are worth.
The proposal also comes amidst broad frustration with the Obama administration, which has so far refused to offer a broad-based plan to bail out underwater borrowers, even as taxpayers have spent hundreds of billions of dollars to prop up banks.
"We’ve seen a bailout of the banking industry, but no bailout for homeowners,” said Arie Giddens, a San Bernardino resident whose home is worth less than half the $300,000 she paid for it in 2005, according to Zillow.
About a dozen communities have voiced some level of interest in the eminent domain plan, including Chicago, Sacramento, New York’s Suffolk County and most recently—according to sources familiar with the discussions—Detroit. Not coincidentally, these communities have also been particularly hard hit by the housing crisis. In San Bernardino County, more than half of all homeowners are underwater, and the foreclosure rate is three-and-a-half times the national average.
"Everyone here has a friend or a family member who has lost their home to foreclosure,” said Greg O’Donnell, the development director at Neighborhood Partnership Housing Services, a housing nonprofit in Ontario, Calif.
At the public hearing, Devereaux said the eminent domain plan is still far from reality.
“Thank you very much,” he said more than once in response to the mortgage industry lobbyists’ criticism of the plan. “We appreciate your involvement.”
Gregory Devereaux, you are a badassmotherf---er…

Nothing had been decided yet, he cautioned. Mortgage Resolution Partners has not even submitted a formal plan yet, he said.
What worries the finance industry is that nothing has been ruled out, either.
Officials in other jurisdictions, by all accounts, are waiting for someone else to make the first move. That someone, if it is anyone, will likely be Devereaux. What he thinks could determine whether the eminent domain proposal winds up on a scrap heap of failed ideas to resolve the housing crisis—or sets new legal precedent on the way to providing mortgage relief to a population at the highest statistical risk of losing their home to foreclosure.
It has come to this: More than five years after home prices fell like a rock into a well, the last hope for some borrowers stuck at the bottom could be a public official unknown even to many citizens of his own county.
On Thursday, Mortgage Resolution Partners announced that they are expanding their original proposal to help individuals underwater on their mortgages by including homeowners who have defaulted or are delinquent on their mortgages.
Keep in mind that this is not all bad for the investors themselves. There’s a (theoretical) “silver lining” upside for them, too: Laurie Goodman, of Amherst Securities, analyzed the potential impact of eminent domain mortgage write-downs: “Taking select loans out of a trust could conceivably result in a higher realized value for (the) investors,” Goodman wrote. “Using eminent domain is a novel (albeit aggressive) idea to reach this goal.”

Banks holding loans already use formulas to decide how far they can write down a mortgage and still make money. The same should hold true for mortgages held in trusts, at least that’s the theory.

The top regulator at the Federal Housing Finance Agency, has warned that the agency might “take action” against San Bernardino County should it decide to adopt the Mortgage Resolution Partners. A highly visible supporter of the plan is California’s lieutenant governor, Gavin Newsom. This could get really interesting.
Gregory C. Devereaux, Chief Executive Officer
 for the County of San Bernardino, California
 
Thank you Michael Backes!

6 comments:

  1. May be a better plan would be to get the CAFR for the county, find a fund to pay the bailout tab for all the homeowners and have change leftover.

    How much money does this county have in its accounts? Has the author of this blog checked the CAFR for this county to access the fiscal health and wealth the counties actually have?

    See more on that report here.

    Thanks Walter B. and Foster G.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-Pvr-eN7Eu8

    I get very nervous giving anyone eminent domain over anything.

    Aren't mortgages fraud to begin with?

    The "system" is the problem. Trying to fix it seems misguided to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great idea, Anon.

      What concerns me is that there may be a line waiting to feed at that trough causing more dissension--last thing we need, right? Something to think about anyway. Having said that, there are solutions to the challenge if we're willing to put in the time and attention it takes to find them.

      In any case I agree with you, there may be better ways (such as CAFR) but at the same time let's not dismiss established 'lore' (eminent domain, etc.) outright. It's available to use right now with the 'right' intent (for once) IF this serves us all together (and only if). There's also an intriguing irony involved if they're hoisted by their own petard. Poetic justice! Exactly so. Sweet and not the least bit vengeful. After all, who made up the rules?

      We can change them anyway once we've cleared the air. Or eliminate 99.9% of the billions (?) of pages smothering us. Anyone like the smell of rotting paradigm in the morning? Me neither. Quick, open the windows and doors! Let the sun shine! Ah. That's better.

      This is all only short/mid-term anyway, I believe. I've struggled with these control issues myself and decided I'm willing to be my own master and servant and nobody else's. But it occurs to me that we can usher in the kind of society we want where the need for authoritarian grabfests becomes entirely moot, and sooner than we might think. Let's remind ourselves: what we've complacently or ignorantly supported isn't in our human nature, despite a relentless parade of propaganda to the contrary. Look at the lengths they've gone to to try and shut us down and lock us up--even if it's only in our own minds and hearts. That's downright fishy right there.

      Besides, we must begetting close to the 100th monkey and I think that scares the power-mongers the most. It's the ol' phase-shift phenomenon. Who knows what form we may take then? Or maybe they know and that's why they're trying so hard.

      Any challenge to their dominion over us must be like another bee sting to them. Inconsequential in and of itself maybe, but add 'em up and soon the poor creature gasps its last breath and fades away into No-Thingness again. So let's get all the options we can muster on the table, consider what we have prudently, and then act swiftly and with determination.

      It'll likely take several avenues of action to bring the house of cards down once and for all. Those cards may be made of paper, but they've been set in stone for a long time now. Not to worry. A pickax here and there will do the trick! Maybe a chisel or two. That's gonna work way better than a couple of rocks and a packet of gravel.

      And don't forget, having many fronts to deal with is always 'taxing.' See, this is the same strategy they've wielded over us. It's time to learn our lessons; we've had excellent tutors after all (or was that the point all along?). We don't need to do what they did or become what they've been, and we won't if we do it differently--our way, with our ideals.

      This little concept of a shared ideal changes everything, simply and immediately. It's a powerful tool we can use to unite us even if we can't figure out how to agree on all the details quite yet. Trying to cross every t and dot every i at this stage will slow us down and we should probably find ways to keep the momentum we're building globally going.

      A flexible grass-roots effort can involve many different strategies, and in fact should--making it that much harder to take out.

      We don't want to throw the baby out with the bathwater, do we? We just need to help the little babies grow the hell up, s'all! Their insecurities have spoon-fed us long enough, I say. Enough of the pabulum. I for one am ready for some grownup food--maybe even some veggies! Hey, pass the spinach Popeye! You bin hoggin' too long.

      Thanks again for your comment, Anon.
      Let's all pool our ideas and get this mess sorted.
      It's time.

      Delete
  2. This looks promising.

    There are many more opportunities to use established 'law,' or rather lore--you know, the story we've subscribed to blindly up till now--for purposes other than those intended by original proponents. As always, 'good and evil' are not absolute but depend on intent and effect.

    EG, as much as we loathe it, NDAA can be put to 'good' use while we sort the wheat from the chaff in this transition phase--particularly with those who've operated at the so-called 'higher' levels of our historical society.

    With NDAA we can quickly contain some of those troublemakers who continue to jeopardize our planet and fellow humanity, preventing further damage.

    Then we sequence them through a process where we work out appropriate details and strategies as we go along--remaining flexible, practical and always acting fairly. Remember, we're humane even if they haven't been. We're moving faster and faster toward the revelation of our greatness together, not the other way around.

    While easier cases can be resolved quickly (and mistakes remedied if they happen), we can also take the time we need to deal with those who prove hardcore and perhaps even unassimilable. Sadly, we may need to face this eventuality.

    Ironically, how we treat these individuals may be our greatest challenge. Let's hope we're up to it.

    In the meantime, we can round up some of the usual suspects as we work out how to help them help themselves if they're willing, as well as those who've been adversely affected of course. Healing is needed across the globe and often this can be accomplished well when the two parties are able to 'con-front' each other with some civility, so we might bear that in mind too.

    Well then, is it such a ridiculous idea to retool an apparatus for good rather than the ill intended in the first place? No. It is pure sanity!

    The use of eminent domain in the manner suggested in this article seems appropriate and looks like an excellent beginning.

    Proceed with caution, but proceed.

    Eventually we won't need any of it, but until then...

    I personally appreciate such efforts greatly. Thank you.

    Now, let's find some more solutions and get the momentum really moving! There's not a single issue we can't resolve when we work well together.

    Once fear and doubt are dealt with, we're only limited by our imagination, and the depth of our resolve to act.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I am leery of "the end justifies the means" thinking. Am I alone?

      Delete
    2. No Obi-Wan you're not alone. It's a sticky wicket. I agree we should question this idea, as with everything else these days.

      Here's one way of looking at it. See how it fits I guess.

      Essentially, I think what we're looking at is finding ways to undermine the status quo.

      As we know the rules of the 'game' were set by certain parties whose interests don't work for the majority. The odds were stacked while most of us were too distracted to pay them any mind. We just assumed they had our best interests at heart (haha) and it never occurred to us they would lie.

      We were bamboozled by an old issue: those who trust openly are generally trustworthy, and those who are suspicious may very well have something to hide. Of course it's not always true. I admit I'm suspicious of pretty much everything these days despite being an open book (in my own eyes anyway!) so I'll just say I learned this the hard way.

      Despite my profound lack of respect for over-reaching authorities and their endless litany of regulations, it seems to me we can use the setup the old guard instituted ourselves. For good or ill depends on our intent and the quality of the outcome. Whether we should or not is certainly worth debating. That's why I emphasize caution, diligence and a sound check on our intent. After that, and only if the idea passes muster, then proceed swiftly.

      There are many behaviors I wouldn’t touch with the proverbial barge pole, no matter how long it was, but so-called 'lawful' actions are up for grabs in my opinion, at least in terms of consideration.

      Until we can agree en masse to not comply with their inane rules (my preferred option BTW) I suggest we consider using some of their executive orders, codes and legislation against them. There's plenty to choose from. Maybe they thought we were too dumbed down to notice that we could.

      Once lit, a match will burn the fingers holding it unless and until it's thrown away. So maybe we can get rid of some of their regulations this way! Just a thought.

      In any event, I believe the last thing we should do at this stage is throw any possible remedy out before we've looked at it. That's why I suggested putting it all on the table. And remember, just because dinner's laid out in front of us doesn't mean we have to actually eat it!

      Personally I'm not in the least bit hungry for vengeance--it's a waste of energy IMHO and I prefer to leave such issues to whatever greater oneness knows enough to help us sort our 'karmic' issues out (which would be us if only we'd remember that altogether we're IT!).

      But until that happens, I'm interested in finding solutions to the issues that challenge us, and at the moment two of them appear to be a rapacious oligarchy and our willingness to rely on some external force to sort them out. The offer sounds great when you're desperate, but it's a double-edged sword too. Maybe we're not as desperate as we think we are anyway.

      Our complacency is what got us into this mess and it only seems right we clean it up ourselves. Maybe all we need to do is make the effort. Don't forget, even the worst bully backs off when a superior force shows up. By the way, in this case that's us, all together.

      It's a good question as to whether we really want another set of entities 'lording' it over us. Assistance, yes. Dictates, no. That's my take on it anyway; but then I'm willing to be responsible and learn from my mis-takes (not short on opportunities there!)

      In the end, consciousness is key, right? And that comes very naturally when we center in our hearts and use our minds well.

      Now, if we'd just get that part figured out we wouldn't have to spend our valuable time trying to coach the rats off their sinking ship so we can maybe try to keep some of it afloat while we're on the lookout for land. Ah well, at least we know how to swim...

      Respect, regards and thanks for your reply, mate.

      Delete
  3. Well, I'm not a fan of imminent domain, but it sure is refreshing to see it used FOR the people for once, instead of to take someone's home or business so they can give the land to WalMart or some other big corporation for just about nothing. Go Mr. Devereaux.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.