Sunday, January 27, 2013

"Dorothy In OZ" Script


  1. Or, as I was thinking.... WTF?

  2. Haha nice! Read if you want to make heads of this.

  3. Ha! Good stuff. Although the courts refusal to adjudicate on the first appearance is grounds for dismissal alone. Same as if a cop did not show for a trial date.

  4. Yesterday 1-27-2013 at I pulled an Isha Lerner "Inner Child" tarot card and it was

    Dorothy in Oz.

    This corresponds to the King of Wands:

    The King of Wands represents pure fire energy. Unlike the other Wands court cards, he is not so interesting in actual creation and creativity, or in dreaming up ideas and implementing them himself. Instead, he is more inclined to take an idea and change the world to match his vision. As such he is a natural-born leader of all kinds of people, and he is very visionary. Once he sets himself a goal, he sticks to it and ensures that he can make it happen with the support of those around him. People naturally gravitate towards this King as they know he will get things done and will do it very well. He is a master, too, at being able to get other people to do his work for him, and keep them on-side throughout the process.

    The King of Wands looks forward to challenges because he enjoys the natural rush of adrenalin associated with solving a difficult problem and coming to a solution that will benefit not just one person but many people. In the process, he not only rids himself of his own fear but that of others, by reassuring them that they shall all succeed. He is not all talk, either, and when the going gets tough, he is prepared to do the hard yards to see something through to the end. The King of Wands has a deep and innate respect for other people, and his compassion extends far. He knows how to bring out the best in others and to empower them to deliver his visions and goals, which he knows will be of benefit to the greater population.

  5. That is perfect explanation of the real game in courthouse. Judge is trying to use all the tricks he can think of to get Dorothy into CONTRACT relationship with the court so he can have jurisdiction by her consent. Dorothy is too smart to get into the contract and is crushing the judge over and over again. Courts are too all about contracts. UCC in action.

  6. So: she didn't give the judge any of her rights, she didn't identify her strawman, judge tried to put a bs claim upon her, she continued try to save the court's/her time(does anyone have the original documents? Does anyone have the actual wet signature(not digital) claim??),used her signature as a free human to close the account in question, was arrested because she didn't obey the thugs in the room, caused the police/corporate thugs to panic, made the judge take off his robes(become a human, NOT a corporate "judge") and as a person he dismissed the case?

    I wish I could speak as a regular human and have them understand me. What she said was right I guess, in this case...but how can we, the public, close accounts made fraudulently in our names? Is this the way to do it?

    1. Don't rise when the judge enters, sit in the gallery
    1a. State you are defending the strawman,but you ARE NOT the strawman(?)
    2. Request the documents that are being used
    3. Sign them and mark the account closed(Wasn't very clear on that part?)
    4. Do not acknowledge anything outside of the claims initially given(not clear on this one?)
    5. If they arrest you, tell them "I hold all my rights, I do not give consent, I am being coerced".


This blog is supported by ads and donations. If you enjoy this blog please consider supporting it with a contribution via PayPal.